![]() "The Federal Circuit's opinion is a win for Oracle and the entire software industry that relies on copyright protection to fuel innovation and ensure that developers are rewarded for their breakthroughs," Daley said in the statement. Oracle General Counsel Dorian Daley, in an emailed statement, said the vendor is "extremely pleased that the Federal Circuit denied Google's attempt to drastically limit copyright protection for computer code." "We're disappointed by this ruling, which sets a damaging precedent for computer science and software development, and are considering our options," the spokesperson said in the statement. Oracle is seeking damages up to $1 billion in the case.Ī Google spokesperson expressed displeasure with the latest court ruling in an emailed statement provided to CRN. Oracle acquired Java when it bought Sun Microsystems in January 2010. ![]() Oracle sued Google in 2010, claiming that the use of Java in Android violated several Java patents, as well as copyrighted material related to the Java platform. Google has argued that its use of Java in Android falls under fair use protections, but the jury was deadlocked on that particular point, according to the court documents in the case. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington ruled that Oracle can copyright Java application programming interfaces (APIs), overturning a June 2012 court ruling that said Google's use of Java in Android did not violate Oracle's patents. Oracle has won an appeal in its four-year old legal battle with Google over the search giant's use of Java technology in its Android mobile operating system, in a development that could have ramifications for other software vendors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |